Selecting the right complex rehabilitation technology device for a young child is not an easy decision. There are many options available, and several factors for the parents and clinical team to consider.
Complex rehabilitation strollers play an important role in supporting and providing dependent mobility for infants and very young children. They combine the look of a stroller with the supportive seating that a small child needs. They differ from regular strollers in how they collapse, the type of supports and accessories available, and how they adjust for growth.  Strollers that have a “reversible seating configuration” on the base allow the parent to view the child’s face, which is especially necessary if the child is medically fragile. The way they are constructed allows them to be disassembled and stored in a vehicle. They typically have attachments on the frame that allow transporting in a vehicle that has tie-downs.  Most offer a 3 point harness that is separate from the positioning chest and pelvic straps to safely secure and support the child in the system.  Often there are available accessory options such as a work tray, caster locks or a rain cover, although some, or all, options may not be covered by insurance.
Many manufacturers include the ability to attach life support devices, such as ventilator trays, oxygen holders, suction machines and IV poles. The team does need to be careful about the number of devices, their impact of increased width and length to the stroller, their added weight, and the complexity they will add to folding and unfolding. There is also potential for other assistive technology devices to be attached, especially as the child enters pre-school, including an augmentative communication device. The team may find that they run out of “real estate” or available places to safely and functionally attach these devices on a stroller. All of this needs to be considered in the prescription process by the team as these variables can often lead to a conversation about the options of a stroller versus a tilt-in-space manual wheelchair.
While strollers fill the need in many circumstances, their seating systems are often times not appropriate for children requiring very complex and aggressive positioning - such as children with very high tone. Additionally, strollers solely provide dependent mobility, and are not necessarily appropriate for children capable of some type of independent mobility, whether it is manual or powered. Parents, therapists and ATPs need to look at this very critically, and judge to the best of their abilities, the potential of the child over the next few years. It can be a challenge to reapply for funding after a year. For example, for an independent base, most payers look for complex rehabilitation equipment to meet a child’s needs for three to five years.
Just as with any other pediatric mobility and seating device, it is important to note in the documentation to the funder the measurements of the child relative to the available measurements and adjustments that can be obtained in the seating, and what the overall weight limits are of the seating/base.
Tips for proper documentation for medical necessity and funding submission:
  • Provide and discuss the information the parents and seating team need to make an appropriate decision on what equipment will best meet the goals of all.
  • Ensure that the child is able to benefit from the available growth and features of the system.
  • Provide current anatomical measurements of the child and compare them to the system today and the growth capability of the seating system and base in the future. For example, child’s current hip width is 7”, and the seating system can grow from 6”-10”.  Greater attention to detail at the front end can assist in faster funding approval, and prevent writing appeal letters or delaying the receipt of needed equipment.
  • Ensure that the child is currently dependent in their mobility equipment needs and does not have the ability or potential to be independent in their mobility in the immediate future.
  • Ensure that the team is realistic about what the base can safely handle in terms of life support/medical equipment. Don’t forget to consider anticipated communication/education-related assistive technology needs as this may dictate the need for a tilt-in-space wheelchair base or other comparable devices.
It can be overwhelming to go through all the options available to meet the mobility needs of a young child, but asking the right questions and considering the immediate and near term needs of the child will be your guide to making the most appropriate choice.
Anne Kieschnik, ATP, CRTS


Anne Kieschnik, ATP, CRTS

Anne Kieschnik, BSW, ATP, CRTS has worked extensively in the field of Assistive Technology providing complex rehabilitation equipment since 1979. Her experiences include working for the Muscular Dystrophy Association, the MED Group, and as an owner of a complex rehabilitation company specializing in pediatrics before joining Numotion in 2012 as ATP Development Manager. Her passion is working with children, especially the 3 year old and younger group. Anne is a current member of the National Registry of Rehabilitation Technology Suppliers and served on the BOD from 1996-2006. She served on the NRRTS board for 10 years and has been active with The Texas Rehab Providers Council . She participated in the 1997 RESNA Certification Validation Committee, has presented to many Allied Professional organizations and speaks nationally on a variety for CRT topics on behalf of Numotion.